Radio activity

Radio activity

Posted April 2nd, 2009 by debritz

Has Triple J lost the plot? According to this report, disenchanted listeners have formed a Facebook page to complain that JJJ has strayed from its remit to "provide a platform for music and artists ignored by its commercial rivals". Others are claiming anomalies in the latest radio survey - and even AC Nielsen, which compiles the figures, has warned against comparing this year's figures with last year's, due to a change in methodology. There are also reports of a smaller=than-usual sample group this time throwing up some odd results. I've been a long-time critic of the survey, and all I can say is I'm not surprised that they still haven't got it right. Time for a method that records what people are actually listening to - such as TV's Peoplemeters - rather than a diary system where they are relied upon to recall what they were listening to. Sadly, many people in the radio industry have a vested interest in not knowing the truth.

Radio people metering...

Brett, it sounds like a good idea. But it wouldn't be compatible with analogue radios, but would be a great option, to start digital radio, where say, Nielson would give you a free digital radio, on the condition you use a USB stick (which doubles as a advanced peoplemeter, which is programmed at Nielson) plugged in to the DAB reciever whenever it is turned on.

The "stick" has the ability to connect via the 3G phone network, to dial ratings results into Nielson in the same manner as TV peoplemeters dial into OzTam, and you could get weekly radio ratings, even daily based on DLF's
(digital listening figures). Say Hamish and Andy did some stunt on a Monday which sends listeners in, or Camilla said something to Stav which drops their audience on a Friday, A instantanious ratings system could solve the problems of the diary system, by increasing surveys from 7 survey periods a year to 40 survey weeks a year.

Television in the capitals has never looked back after the diary system was replaced around twenty years ago.
Radio stations would no longer wait till the end of the year to make decisions on talent, with talent being grilled every week. Had this been in place, Jamie Dunn would not have lasted this long at 4BC.

These units would also be designed for a future return to metro TV ratings for Nielson, with the mini-meters, being plugged in as a add-on for most TV's and STB's.

Analogue would keep using the diary system, of 7 surveys a year until sufficient takeup of DAB occurs in Australia (I am talking about when 2/3rds of all radio listeners use DAB) where analogue can be safely switched off, area by area.

Posted by Kuttsywood (not verified) on April 2, 2009 - 19:53
A better solution is the
A better solution is the "Dick Tracy" watch which is already in use in Europe, which records and identifies what the wearer is listening to, whether it be on digital or analogue. The reason it's not wanted here is that it may show, for instance, that people are listening to community stations like 96.5FM or "out of town" broadcasters like River 949. The big players in radio simply don't want to know that ...

Posted by debritz on April 2, 2009 - 21:34
People listening to 96.5?

People listening to 96.5? Brett, I didn't know you were doing comedy these days!

Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on April 5, 2009 - 01:14
Say, you don't work in
Say, you don't work in commercial radio do you? This is exactly my point, the survey doesn't take 96.5,Logan 101, Triple A or Triple Z seriously. There's no doubt they all have listeners, and if I were in the radio business I'd want to know who they were and why they're not listening to my station. It's a numbers game, but a lot of numbers aren't being properly counted because the survey diary doesn't properly accommodate them. (What the ... is "other FM" to the average punter?) It's a bit like the LNP or Labour doing polling and not allowing people to answer that they will vote for the Greens. There may not be a lot of them, but you're an idiot if you don't want them to swap to your side.

Posted by debritz on April 5, 2009 - 10:33
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.