A tale of two critics

A tale of two critics

Posted November 2nd, 2009 by debritz

Two quotes from different writers:

This production is QTC's triumph of the decade, so see it and be prepared to be taken out of your comfortable world and sit shivering on the edge of your seat - that is, when your heart starts beating again.

Powerful moments of fragile vulnerability are drowned out by yawning dullness. Provocative subtext is lost by basic presentations of the script. Moments of high drama seem contrived and uncomfortable ... And so the audience is left with awkward embarrassment.

QTC image of The CrucibleBoth are reviews of the same theatre production -- Queensland Theatre Company's revival of Arthur Miller's The Crucible, directed by Michael Gow and now playing at the QPAC Playhouse in Brisbane. The first quote is from the A Little Gossip arts newsletter and written by Alison Cotes, who I have known for a long time and has been reviewing theatre in Brisbane for more than 30 years. The second quote was published under the headline "How the Queensland Theatre Company crucified Miller's Crucible" and was published on the Brisbane Times website. It's written by Katherine Feeney, who I don't know but I believe has been writing for the BT website since its inception a couple of years ago, and pens a sex and relationships column called CityKat. While I have read arts interviews and listings under her name, I can't recall reading a review by her before. Readers who rely on published reviews to shape their ticket-buying choices would be confused by such a stark contrast in critical assessment, the likes of which I have not seen in years. Of course, I'm not claiming that one is right and one is wrong. I haven't seen the play but, from what I can gather online, the audience reaction on opening night was very positive. Another critic well known to me, Katherine Lyall Watson, says at ourbrisbane.com that the play is "not without its flaws, but the joys of the production far outweigh them". And Eric Scott, a vastly experience journalist whose opinion I also value, says at his absolutetheatre.com.au website: "This is the most powerful production from the Queensland Theatre Company I think I’ve seen. Director Michael Gow’s casting was perfect in this 20 character play, which used 19 actors, and he moulded them brilliantly into a gripping, suspenseful piece of theatre drama. It was the finest piece of direction I’ve seen from the company’s Artistic Director." At the end of the day, if you're thinking of shelling out the money for a show, I guess you have to trust the people you know and/or whose assessments have generally aligned with your own. After all, nothing can replace seeing it for yourself.

The Crucible

Hey Brett,

I saw The Crucible last Friday night, and read Katherine Feeney's review with interest. I really enjoyed the production, and while I would certain agree the production was not perfect, I think it was very strong overall, with some great moments & concepts.

I've written my own review over at http://www.girlclumsy.com

Cheers, Natalie.

Posted by Girl Clumsy (not verified) on November 2, 2009 - 15:46
It's a good read, Natalie
It's a good read, Natalie - and thanks for the shout out. As you know, I'm a big supporter of live theatre, and I realise that most people can't afford to buy tickets to everything and they rely on critics to guide them. I know it's especially true of films that many people pick a reviewer whose tastes accord with their own and seek out their opinion before heading to the cinmea. With theatre reviewers, though, there are fewer to choose from - and, sadly, there's always a few who simply want to make a name for themselves as writers rather than genuinely striving to do justice to the production, the creatives and, especially, the potential audience.

Posted by debritz on November 2, 2009 - 17:09
I have not seen the

I have not seen the production yet but am really curious about it. I have already read a few reviews about that and Katherine Feeney's review was the most interesting. I am going to see it for sure!

Posted by Ornella Malvorlagen Kostenlos (not verified) on November 3, 2009 - 20:54
Hmm "Of course, I'm not

Hmm "Of course, I'm not claiming that one is right and one is wrong".... I think you are. I saw the production on the first night and I thought it was ordinary, very ordinary. The fact that the 'legitimate' Brisbane theatre crowd seems to be falling all overitself to label this production "a triumph" whilst simultaneously denigrating anyone who disagrees with them seems to me just a little too Salem-like for my liking.

What, shall we hang City Kat for daring to comment about theatre? Witch! Witch!

Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on November 4, 2009 - 16:57
First, there's no right
First, there's no right and wrong, and I have no issue with Kat Feeney if she is writing what she truly believes. The point I'm making, or at least trying to make, is that people build up a relationship with critics, and many search for somebody whose tastes and opinions coincide with their own. In my case, I am more likely to accept the verdict of somebody I have known for a long time than somebody whose tastes I don't know. Theatre tickets aren't cheap, so people are right to look for guidance, and what's true for one person may not be so for another. If Ms Feeney strikes a chord with a certain audience, and she is consistent in her approach, then she has the makings of a fine critic.

Posted by debritz on November 4, 2009 - 17:11
Yep, theatre tickets are

Yep, theatre tickets are definitely not cheap which is why before I wasted time and money I would have been grateful to read Kat Feeney's review and heed it. The insult on top of this is to be told in no uncertain terms that 'people in the know' think it was 'a trumph'. I really really don't think it was. Far from it. And, like Kat Feeney, no amount of claimed authority will make me believe it, just as John Proctor refused to believe that his fellow townfolk were witches.

Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on November 4, 2009 - 17:25
Well, it looks like you've
Well, it looks like you've found your critic of choice -- which is, as I said, what it's all about.

Posted by debritz on November 4, 2009 - 17:48
Hey debritz - feeney has

Hey debritz - feeney has done a few other reviews. she's pretty consistent. from what i can tell, she's one of the first new young voices on the arts circut unafraid to pander to what i like to look at as the old QLD establishment. for too loon arts in qld have had to be parochial to survive. now that there's money - why shouldn't we be critical when it's due? helps raise standards in my opinion.

Here are other reivews form here that i found

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/entertainment/your-brisbane/laughs-aplenty-but-butterfish-leaves-locals-looking-for-more-20091005-giza.html

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/entertainment/your-brisbane/bangarra-dancers-on-fire-at-qpac-20091008-go86.html

Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on November 20, 2009 - 10:46
Post new comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.